Tooling & Production

August 2008 Edition

larger margin

Joseph F. McKenna
Dennis G. Seeds
Editor-in-Chief

Tool for the job

Handing over brass hammer a rite of passage

One summer quite a few years back, I worked on an automotive production line while I was on college break. I learned several jobs on the line working beside a variety of people, and we had some interesting conversations.

Asian/European competition? Hadn’t thought about it then.

Good wages? Schoolteachers were among the assembly line ranks, earning more in the factory than they could in the classroom.

Health care? Wasn’t an issue then either.

For eight hours a day, I was putting main bearing caps on V-8 engine blocks to hold the crankshaft.

One of my jobs was to put the cap into position, and tap it home with a brass hammer. I would grab a couple of the U-shaped bearing caps at a time to save time. Fittingly, I was later cross-trained to torque down the bolts that held the bearing caps.

I was quite conscientious about doing this. I told myself my bearing cap had to be aligned perfectly before I tapped it down. It was quite a task at first to synchronize my motions with the production line. Sometimes it took me two stops of the line to finish. But I improved, and got in synch with the line so it only took one stop.

The veteran worker who gave me a quick course on bearing cap installation was a master at it. His cap alignment was perfect, the hammer tapping was smooth and light, and his whole movement flow was slick.

When he was finished with the lesson, he handed over the hammer to me — the next generation, so to speak — with a "Here you go" gesture. T&P

Since that time, the hammer has been handed over to many employees, but much has changed, and the hammer is a little heavier. Asian and European competition has entered the arena, wages are now at the point where new hires make about half what veteran workers earn, and some health care insurance costs have been shifted to a union-run trust fund.

Why this had to be done is well known. North American automakers had to face the competition, wrestle with higher costs, and improve declining sales. General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler (the Detroit Three) have been adopting leaner processes, offering buyouts to tens of thousands of workers, and closing plants.

In 2007, the Detroit Three improved so much in the face of lower production that they nearly erased the productivity deficit against their Japanese competitors, according to The Harbour Report, a guide to North American auto manufacturing.

As for the biggest productivity improvement, Chrysler took the prize, with a 7.7 percent reduction to 30.37 hours of labor to manufacture a vehicle.

Coincidentally, that was the same figure for Toyota. GM and Ford were close behind. However, Ford and GM were given good marks in the recent J.D. Power and Associates Initial Quality Report. The Ford nameplate rose to No. 8 (tying with Jaguar) from No. 10 last year. The J.D. Powers survey tracks the number of mechanical problems and design-related issues owners experience during the first 90 days of possession.

Also, GM’s Chevy Malibu was named one of the best new midsize vehicles of the year, a significant accomplishment for an all-new model.

Here’s another conclusion from the Harbour Report that is a plus: Although labor costs remain high, the weak dollar and new labor agreements have made North America a more attractive region for manufacturing than it has been. North American automakers have become competitive globally, only slightly behind Japan, but ahead of most other regions, the report says.

While the playing field is becoming a little more level, a significant difference still exists in profits per vehicle. Chrysler, Ford, and GM were in the red while Honda, Nissan, and Toyota posted profits. That means there’s still a job to be done for the North Americans.

So the Detroit Three have to keep passing on the hammer to the next generation — a lighter and leaner hammer each time — while keeping the quality. The 2007 figures show that improvement efforts are beginning to snap into place.

IMTS VISITORS — We look forward to seeing you at the show Sept. 8-13. Stop by and say hello at Booth D-4353!

editor's blogs

Dennis Seeds

Off the Toolpath

EASTEC marks 30th show with spotlight on medical devices
The recession hasn’t stopped business, if the activity at the EASTEC Advanced Productivity Exposition is to judge. The show, in its 30th year, drew 570 exhibitors, down from 608 in 2008 and 650 in 2007. About 15,000 attendees pre-registered. Last year’s show tallied 14,000 attendees. The largest industrial tool trade show on the East Coast, EASTEC was held May19-21 in West Springfield, MA.
by Dennis Seeds, Editor-in-Chief

digital edition

On target
For a new generation of parts, automated centerless grinding fills the bill

The taper test
Prototype fixture finds the reason why vexing toolholder wear marks appear

Watchful eye keeps tabs on 575 machine tools
Aerospace supplier sees new productivity heights, lower costs

From 12 hrs to 25 mins
Giant steps for faster cavity hogging, square-offs follow re-tooling

AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT

Goodway Tech Corp

CLASS

Innovative Carbide Inc

CLS

Shear-Loc

CONTROLS - DRO,CNC

Siemens MCS

INSPECTION & MEASURING MACHINES

Haimer Usa

Stotz Usa LLC

MACHINING CENTERS/ MILLING/ BORING MACHINES

Haas Automation INC

Modern Machine Tool

MANUFACTURING SOFTWARE

Gibbs & Associates

ROTARY

Troyke Manufacturing

Copyright © 2009 by Nelson Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction Prohibited. View our terms of use and privacy policy.